The Potocols are a work of Genius, we should claim it for ourselves and Rebuild Humanity.


 Electronic privacy is one of the most over debated topics for ten years running. We hear from thousands of experts, officials and hysterical porn addicts. Each and every one of them approaches the issue from one of two viewpoints: Privacy at all cost versus public security at all cost. I believe these to be pre-agreed opposites to serve as fake discussion issue while the Orwellian agenda is happening around us anyway. The true solution is much simpler, cheaper and safer. We stop worrying about electronic privacy on anything you cannot secure reliably. Let them openly read your letters and scrutinise your shopping lists. None of that is new, King Solomon did it. The nosy old woman at the post office did it. Then we open the Book of Public Accounts. Enact a read-only public server, open to any citizen at any time. The data can be updated at the end of every working day. It’s that easy.


Monsanto and Bayer, a Bad Buy, or just more Holocau$t Reparation?

Monsanto, for those of us who don’t care about such things, is the world’s largest agrochemical company. Was. They have been bought out by Bayer, a German chemical giant, in a surprising move. Why surprising? Because Monsanto is under fire for billions, possibly trillions of dollars in liability claims. Yet, Bayer bought Monsanto, problems and all. What makes this even more surprising, is that Monsanto was well on its way to fulfil their dream: owning the world’s food supply. Or, to put it in their words: “End world hunger and feed the world.” If that sentence sounds like it says the same thing twice, we forgive you. It takes a certain world-weary cynicism to see the two very different philosophies in that statement.

Read more ...

Baal Gates, Davos and the World Economic Forum Discuss the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Have you wondered what exactly people mean when they refer to the much-vaunted 4th Industrial Revolution? This author became suspicious of the idea of a fourth revolution the day a dear acquaintance used the term when trying to convince me (yet again) what a paranoid conspiracy theorist I am. A salesman with no interest in science, technology or engineering, celebrates, nay, educates an engineer, on the “fourth industrial revolution”? Something is wrong…

So, like a good internet junkie, I set forth to discover what exactly this industrial revolution is, because my STEM education never said nothing about that, thirty years ago. Nothing specific can be found, unfortunately, except for thousands, possibly millions of parrots going “4th revolution, 4th revolution, 4th revolution” with no indication as to what, exactly, is being revolutionised. Cellphones? Been around almost thirty years. New chat apps? Wow! Internet banking? Gimme a break! “Social Media” is certainly not an Industrial Revolution, liberal airheads are notoriously anti-industry. None of the “examples” supplied actually were new or revolutionary. Then we found some links to the website of the World Economic Forum, and the WEF is terribly excited about this great revolution. As a matter of fact, they have an entire web page dedicated to the great upcoming Fourth Industrial Revolution, and their Think Tank at Davos 2020. Look:


It took some close reading to find actual information, but eventually we found it. If you look to the left of the veeerryy high-technology abstract painting above, you may decipher the tiny spider webs to be letters informing you: “…blah blah… concrete cooperation on governance challenges and opportunities…blah blah”. Best read at least 200% magnification. So, this “fourth industrial revolution” is actually the implementation of Big Brother systems for “governance”, which means “control all actions of the population”. Yes, yes, that old conspiracy yarn again, eh what? How can we deduce something as sinister as totalitarian control from an innocent sentence by professionals and experts, who think soooo much higher than us mere consumers… One has to watch your own thoughts, lest they lead you into the low hell of bias confirmation and paranoid self-delusion, not so? So let us see then, the agenda for the meetings on this ‘revolution’ that the World Economist will discuss on their Forum: They give it to us as a diagramme of sensuous curves in bright, friendly colours…


Do you see the numbers at the top? If you follow them in order, the argument goes like this:

We will all share in the prosperity that cooperation will bring by earning us more money so we can afford the technology that will save the planet. Prosperity, cooperation, free trade, safe technology and eternal life. Who can argue about that? But there are words under those numbers, let us look at them, shall we?

  1. When you use words like “cohesive, inclusive and social” together, you are speaking the language of the communist, because I hear “no dissent, no merit and for other people’s benefit”.
  2. “Global cooperation” is the Bolshevik communist’s attack on nationality, national pride, patriotism and the nuclear family. No borders allowed, but also no differences in culture, religion or political outlook.
  3. “Accelerating business transformation and growth” is the capitalist fulfilling the communist wet dream of using monopolies and financial strangulation to absorp all businesses and industries under one global management and ownership.
  4. Accelerating smart solutions for “sustainable development” means technology will be reserved for use by those who can prove their activities sustainable, in other words, conducive to the usurpation of all private and public property by those who own the stock market. Not the stocks, the market!
  5. Lastly they want to “mobilise innovation and entrepreneurship to protect people and planet”. This from the people who insist the planet is overpopulated. Is that why they say “people” instead of, maybe, ‘humanity’ or ‘mankind’ or even just ‘everyone’? Only people who matter, matter maybe?

But that is not the only lies hiding in their sexy little diagram, oh no. To get closer to the truth, we have to follow the colourful ‘track to tangible outcomes’. If you follow those voluptuous curves, they sort of come together into one whole at the bottom, they sort of intertwine into one wonderful miracle. Or do they? As those ‘pathways’ cross over each other, it actually changes the order of importance for the numbers above. When you read that order as a comprehensive plan, it reads as follows:

Under the guise of ‘business as usual’, the communist confiscation of private property and universal surveillance will enforce uniformity amongst the nationless survivors of the Great Cull. To this end, a ‘Think Tank” will utilise three approaches:

  1. Incubate the mental egg the moderators of the ‘conference’ lays in your collective consciousness, after which you will
  2. report on the most likely ways to convince the rest of the consuming scum, then you will
  3. review your solutions to see what, if any, objection the useless eaters may or may not raise.

The ‘desired outcome’ of this think tank, in other words, the purpose for which they are being employed, is to “propel interaction towards tangible outcomes”. Interaction of what or whom? The only grammatically obvious target is the ‘man in the street’ and his stupid, corrupt, idiotic government that can manage nothing without foreign investors and expert (foreign) advisors, both groups deemed unnecessary, dangerous even, for the planet and the “protected people”.

So, the Davos crowd has this technology thing down pat, and they are having Serious Thoughts on it. Their stated goal on page one is this:
“We partner with governments, leading companies, civil society, and experts from around the world to co-design and pilot innovative new approaches to policy and governance in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Note the final bit; “…innovative new approaches to policy and governance in…” The Fourth Industrial Revolution has nothing to do with technology per se, it is about GOVERNANCE, and how to exploit technology to enforce that governance upon a diminished, uniform and compliant communist populace. Last year Davos decided we need a pandemic serious enough to enforce vaccinations. This year, they are thinking upon Big Brother technology, what hell awaits us this time?

Of course, our new messiah, Baal Gates, is billed as “Agenda Contributor”.

All hail, Lord William is bringing us the fourth and final industrial revolution! I wonder how often he will have to issue patches and updates for this inherently karky system…

Corporate Crimes and the 3 Laws of Robotics

  1. A robot may not, by action or inaction, cause harm to a human.
  2. A robot shall obey orders from a human, except where in conflict with Rule 1.
  3. A robot shall protect itself from harm, provided it does not conflict with Rule 1 or 2.

What is a robot? The term is from a Czech slang term for a slave worker. Isaac Asimov originally used it to describe a machine with human-like qualities. The modern term denotes any machine with a degree of autonomy, with no specification as to that degree. Even a subroutine on your phone, keeping a look-out for supermarket specials, is acceptably called a bargain-hunting ‘bot, or similar. For our purposes here, and everywhere else, may we propose the following definition of a robot:

Any system that collects inputs, and delivers pre-determined outputs, according to a predetermined set of instructions, acting with a degree of autonomy, qualifies under the description of ‘robot’.

This includes your bank!

Read more ...

Political Scientists, Economists, Witchdoctors, Charlatans of All Sorts

The Holy Profits of Mammon, with 20-20 vision in hindsight.

Political science serves the same purpose as economics; finding elaborate reasons to prove that last week’s accident was actually an inevitable consequence of well-understood processes which must be fixed by legislation and regulation. The rest of their time is spent building reasons and theories and excuses for next week’s accident. They also plan the entire PR side of all such accidents, well beforehand, which is why their stories are always so repetitive; they think we never learn from their mistakes.

Read more ...

Carbon Taxes Explained (NOT) by a Professor Carbon Himself

The Paranoid Goy presents to you the ‘reasoning’ behind carbon taxes, as explained by some …entity important enough to be quoted as The Authority on Wikipedia. It may amuse the reader to research the solutions originally proposed back in the ‘seventies, when the problem of industrial pollution started to attract formal scientific attention. We talked about filters, and chimney scrubbers, which “scrubbed” the smoke of poisons before it left the chimney. We designed elaborate but permanent solutions to contain the pollution we release into the environment. Designers were building garden ponds for factories, where biological processes were supposed to precondition waste water before release, engineers were competing to make the biggest, cheapest, most compact filters humanly possible. This would put the cost on the polluter directly, and this is where it died.

Read more ...


    Economics Theories all serve the same purpose: Finding new ways of corrupting Law to serve High Finance.

    Article Count:

    The document everyone hates without even reading it.

    We propose hijacking the thing to save mankind from slavery to the Hive culture

    Article Count:

    Everything we are being taught, is being used to enslave us.


    Everything we are not being taught, is to keep us enslaved.

    Article Count: