Parent Category: ON BEING HUMAN WITHOUT A HIVE MENTALITY
The war against Organised Crime continues unabated and very successfully, and the War on Drugs has seen an entire generation of toddlers saved from attention deficit (boredom and accompanying naughtiness) by tripping out on prescription amphetamines like ADDerol and fluorides like Prozac. Numerous people have committed numerous horrendous crimes under the influence of these psychotic drugs, and were suitably arrested, prosecuted and punished. Our welfare services and our police forces seem to finally have gotten their act together, getting them crazies their just deserves. Our Justice and Health services are, of course, doing their best to get more people onto mandated (forced) medication regimes using these wonderful drugs. Mood-altering drugs for children is part of the official approach to street crime. Pharmaceuticals is one of the top three stock performers of 2017. Financial services and weaponry did well, too.
Not least of the weapons in the War, is the ever-increasing Transparency of Government, in itself a whole arsenal, on par with any nuclear deterrent when compared to, say, the Cold War. Between the War on Organised Crime and Transparent Governance, we can all be assured the continued health and profitability of the entire War Industry, be it Drugs, Poverty or Venezuelan Intransigence. The population’s only worry is what product or service is next to be declared unlawful, causing yet more social destruction, necessitating yet another ‘upgrade’ of our ‘security forces’. Rather, that is what the populace would worry about, was it not more important to attend to the weekly ritual of sitting on your ass screaming at two teams of overgrown boys playing with each other’s balls. For money…and fame…and we subsidise this. In the meantime, commenting on the news is being ‘investigated’ to redefine the limits of operation of official press organs, duly registered and taxed. Also, they are institutionalised and properly aligned to the correct world view. This requires all data suppository providers to close the network around all unregistered socio-political remarks, effectively rendering any website containing unsanctioned comment to be censored. The War on Fake News has begun.
By now the sarcasm should be obvious to any but the most committed Globalist. When a governing body declares a substance, service or product illegal, they are not intent on eradicating said contraband, they are drawing precise and clear boundaries around that specific trade, thereby effectively creating a monopoly, unfettered and untaxed, with an entire legal system and a police force to protect the trade. This is how the War on Drugs meant the CIA, under Bill Clinton, had an entire fleet of aeroplanes carrying cocaine, landing on private airstrips, loaded and unloaded by real soldiers, whose real purpose is always to kill anyone interfering in the trade. This means, you will not smuggle cocaine, you must buy it from your local retailer, or join the criminal society and buy from the wholesaler, but you will never rise above that. In the late ‘nineties, the South African Police, in CONJUNCTION WITH THE FBI, undertook a four-and half year intensive investigation, after which they jointly declared that, yes indeed, “:..the possibility does indeed exists that Nigerians in Hillbrow (the Bronx of South Africa) are selling cocaine.” Really, around 1999, after 4 ½ years of intensive investigation, by the FBI, what the hell has the FBI lost in Hillbrow? They came to protect their ‘investment’, that’s what. Bill Clinton apparently still runs the cocaine trade, while the opium trade in Afghanistan breaks records every single year since the Americans arrived to take over protection of the poppy fields from the British, who apparently tired of the desert after some years. According to proven legend, the Bush family really liked heroin, and had real deep fingers into that er...business. The English, or at least the Crown, has had a good run at running opium for more than a century, I guess they sold that business on to one of their American holdings, with the concommittant duty of American Forces to ringfence said 'contraband' business, i.e. protect the trade against all interderence. Now the Brits only send money and bombs, so they still support the war against Muslim Extremism.
We can thankl the Brits for manufacturing the excuse that convinced the world to attck the Taliban: Right there, on our televisions, we could see 'them' destroying a set of gigantic stone statues against a mountain, obviously part of mankind's ancient history, to be protected at all cost? Well, a number of very ancient stone statues were removed using imported machinery and workers, shipped and finaced by 'collectors' in Britain and possibly other countries. Britain 'owned' the Afghan landscape but the Taliban were giving them hell. So the Brits started stealing ancient art, but the world was told Osama Bin Laden is busy destroying the heathen imagery. Actually, the Taliban was going around burning the poppy fields, those damn terrorists. Now, 2018, every other news outlet will assure you that the Taliban is being kept alive by the money earned from opium production, and America is trying to stop these raghead devils. Not only is the Taliban opposed to all forms of drugs, being seriously Muslim and all, but the Americans are doing their utmost best to keep up the ever-increasing profits. Record harvests every single year since the Americans came to 'liberate' the poor ragheads. The 'Net is overflowing with photos of Yankee soldiers amongst the poppies, but not one single incidence of fields being destroyed by means of radioactive scrap metal bullets. The Yanks now own the Afghan opium trade, see? Traditionally, of course, this 'business' belonged to the Queen herself, but London has moved across the Big Pond to New York and surrounds. As evidence please consider the thousands of Americans dying of opioid overdoses lately, and yet it seems they need more drugs, and their military is providing protection to Big Pharma, allowing their expensive synthetic drugs to hold the market monopoly against cheap and natural opium, or less natural but still relatively cheap (by health insurance standards) heroin.
In this context, consider the fact that it is illegal to own a rough diamond. If you pick one up, you have to run to the nearest policeman to report it, after which it shall be taken away from you for a small, insignificant compensation. Unless you picked it up off the wrong piece of soil, in which case you will go to jail. I myself was conscripted into a war against communism that in reality turned out to be an attempt to prevent Angolans from picking up little stones and ‘influencing the market’ by selling the diamonds laying around them. The entire South African Defence Force descended upon the Kaokoveld to protect De Beers' profits. It has been alleged that more than half the SA Police force works for the "Diamond Squad". This is a lot of security services given to a corporation that avaoids paying taxes as a matter of principle. Gold, cannabis, prostitution, trading children for sex, all heavily protected industries ‘invested’ by the very upper layer of society. One has to wonder why there is never a cop to help when your grandmother is being gangraped. That very famous American Presidential pair that almost became a pair of presidents? They are pederasts, and Her Ladyship was implicated in multiple cases of child smuggling during her stint as Secretary of State and before. Currently, paedophiles all over America are being arrested in elaborate law enforcement exercises long overdue. While I applaud the defuckulisation of every childbonker, I distrust this effort in view of the large-scale propaganda in the media to 'normalise' paedophilia and present paedophiles as adults with choices, and children as playfully complicit. Take note in movies, three-second news reports and advertisements. The police force running the protection scam for that particular mafia is known all over the world as some form of Child Protection Services, running their orphanages and forster homes as brothels for the well-connected.
Think of any highly illegal act, any obviously criminal process, think of the most despicable crime, and somewhere an entire police brigade is busy making sure no-one interferes in the organised running thereof. The FBI was created for the purpose of policing taxes and excise duties on alcohol during the Prohibition. After the Prohibition ended, three corporations held all licences to trade in liquor. You could buy liquor during the Prohibition, but it had to be from 'legal establishments', and many a small public house just burned down... This is also something to keep in mind when discussing this new-fangled War on Fake News. Someone is building a monopoly on providing fake news, and we better not interfere. Remember the book 1984. The real story is about how the main character goes to work every day, fetching old newspapers, and rewriting the old newspapers to agree with the latest news. It will soon become distasteful to refer to old news, start listening to the more ‘enlightened’ of your peers, some are already using the term Fake News as an insult against anyone who questions the official, updated and reinforced narrative.
Oh, and Transparent Governance? Just remember, there is no way you could run a multi-trillion buck criminal organisation without government sanction. This means you need to BE government, or at least own it, like the Guptas are said to own Zuma. Why is it, every time we uncover a major syndicate, anywhere in the world, there is at least one senior policemen in the net? The more senior the policeman, the more serious the ‘Organisation’, with child trafficking well represented by commissioners, Minister and Directors of police forces the world over. Obviously, if government is complicit in organised crime, we should be able to catch them at it? Of course we do, every day we uncover another corrupt official serving another corrupt criminal master, and every time we catch them at it good enough to make the charges stick, what is their standard response?
“We as the government are always striving towards total transparency and accountability.” In English, this translates as: ‘We are boss, and every time you catch us, we learn how to make the process more transparent, with better safeguards to track down and severely punish those who let slip our little secrets.” In this context, it is worth remembering that ‘transparent’ means you can see right through it; a thing that is totally transparent is invisible. We should be demanding TRANSLUSCENT governance, in other words, you can see right through it, but you can also clearly see the limits and boundaries as well as all the details inside of that which you are looking at. Then we would be able to see the way your council member influences property prices by insisting the local police patrol the other side of town more often with less resources, then when he starts buying up criminal-infested land on the ‘forgotten’ side of town, and suddenly demands police presence, we can safely assume he is a property developer type Mafioso, or not? But apparently any and all government records are not to be available to public scrutiny, for reasons of “national security”, which is the legal term for the ‘organised management’ of state resources by persons unknown. See other articles on the site about the very obvious and above all cheap and easy way we could stop this sort of thing overnight. It involves the scrapping of all Case Study lawyerism, and implementing 3 simple rules to manage the technology currently used as a weapon against us, including our telephones. Search at the top for “3 laws” or ‘electronic privacy’. You may know the three laws of technology as Asimov’s Laws of Robotics.