Sheldon's Dream: The Singularity and Uploading Your Mind to a Computer

So, the famous Doctor PhD. (Phy.) Sheldon Lee Cooper wants to live long enough to experience the privilege of uploading his marvellous intellect to a robot. While this sounds ridiculous to some, for others, it promises immortality. But what does the circuitry look like inside an artificial brain? How does artificial intelligence operate? What does a robot dream about? Is my laptop yearning for a prostitute’s warm embrace? How big a hard drive will you need to upload one brain? Will I spend an eternity inside a machine somewhere, trapped, immortal and still wondering where I left my keys? Can I take my wife with? Does she want to come? Will we be able to come? Will Google supply us with virtual condoms, so we do not overpopulate the server farm with little skeptoid subroutines? Will my virtual totty be big enough? Will my stoopit head get an upgrade, adding some of that artificial intelligence to my own ignorance? Will they implant me with an APP that trusts my government? How much cleverer will I be? Will I be a good citizen, friend, lover? Will I ever find my keys? How artificial will my intelligence be?

Read more ...

Corrupt Judges, Legal Precedent and Case Study Law, the Unholy Trinity of Justice

Our justice system has been hijacked by an exclusive gentlemen’s club, called the BAR.  In our so-called Roman Dutch Law, you may speak in higher courts only if you are a member in good standing with the BAR. As a lawyer, advocate or judge, you are bound, not by The Law, but Law as interpreted by the BAR. No crime committed by a judicial lackey has any real repercussions; if you know the right people, you can literally get away with murder. Should a lawyer, however, act contrary to the rules of his BAR club, he is immediately sanctioned, disowned and thrown to the wolves, to become an ambulance chaser or real estate agent. Out courts are subject to the rules and regulations of a club most people think is a government institution. Oh, and their main clubhouse is apparently in London.

Not only does the buddy-buddiness of our judicial officials open our justice system to corruption and bribery, it has a far more sinister consequence: Our law is interpreted on a case-by-case basis, using tricks of the trade, like case-studies and legal precedents. This is where a poor man walks into a courtroom for the same crime as a rich man, but somehow, the rich man’s lawyer ‘remembers’ a case in 1973 when a judge determined killing a man wearing a green shirt is less serious on every second Friday. For the poor man, murder is murder, for the rich, it is a regrettable mistake. Using a judgement as legal precedent is complete disregard for the law, it means that, once a judge has been bribed, his corrupted utterances can be used in perpetuity to excuse the transgressions of those who can afford the kind of lawyer that can convince a judge to accept the judgement of a corrupted court from the past. Somehow, these defences are not available to the poor from ordinary lawyers. For us, justice must be commensurate with the crime.

Also, if a rich man stands against a poor man, there is nothing stopping the two lawyers from sharing the much greater fee of the rich man, leaving the poor man poorer, for the court shall order the loser to pay for everything. There is nothing that stops a rich man from accusing a poor man of any crime whatsoever, because he has a lawyer on call. How can having a lawyer on call give you such power? Again, the richer you are, the ‘better class’ your lawyer, and here is the most important qualification for all lawyers:

A good lawyer knows the law, a great lawyer knows the judge.

This is the soul of our justice system, and the justice system underlies or national character: our law belongs to a bunch of good old boys in London, and they are very concerned about the lawlessness and radicalisation of the lower classes. I would take this to court, but I cannot afford a lawyer…

Frankly, I would rather be judged by a convocation of elders unfamiliar with all parties, than by a bunch of professional buddies who don’t care one way or another whether the law is being served, upheld, enforced or corrupted, as long as they all agree life’s good, the rest can go rot.

That is The Law as we know it, tra-lalla-la-la-laa.

What African-Americans and Zionists have in Common

Protocol 3, lines 6-10. The valuable slave.

The first thing one has to know about slaves, is this: The Good Ones Cost a Lot. Even bad slaves have commercial value. Like a bad dog, you can feed it well and groom it a bit before you put the mongrel up for sale as a thoroughbred; that’s the stuff the free market is made of. One thing remains constant though; slaves may be defranschised chattels, but they are worth money. No sane person stands around burning his own money therefor no sane man abuses his slaves, a basic exercise in economics. Despite this simple motive of profit, which is merely greed, institutionalised and controlled, there are two ethnic groups who argue their very political existence upon the false premise that their enslaved forebears were victims of institutionalised torture and genocide by White Man.

The first group we shall deal with easily; the American Black Fascist. Many Afro-Americans –not all- are the progeny of slaves imported to work on plantations run by English Noblemen thrown out of Europe, mostly for criminal behaviour that not even the royal courts could cover up. The slaves were needed, as the plantations have been developed beyond the point where the few surviving indentured workers could no longer cope, the men and children who built the original plantations have either been worked to death, or managed to escape into the mountains. Whereas ‘criminally unemployed’ pre-teen boys from Ireland came for free and with (dis)inheritable chattels attached, slaves were expensive and therefor well looked after. They were allowed to build houses, those many of thousands of dead white boys had to sleep where they were ‘out of the way’, and eat what they could scrounge, and were worked to death in the sun, or ran away into the mountains, broke, scared and their fair Island skins burned like lobsters, ‘rednecks’, the joke of black slaves wearing actual clothes and eating actual food from actual tables. Sure, some dumb bastard in town will always kick his dogs, beat his wife, molest his kids and beat his slave senseless. While the existence of such men is a constant, the horrible abuse that modern blacks claim, is sheer nonsense, belied by basic economics theory. You treat your slave well, even if just long enough to sell him off to the next unsuspecting owner just like any bad motor car. Or do you propose we compost our cars every time we buy a new one, forget the trade-in value?

The other ethnic group that would like us to confuse slavery with genocide is of course those who promote that Great Modern Horror, the Holocaust. The Jewish Anti-Defamation League will viciously prosecute any evidence against their version of history, but it is worth noting that Juden chosen for arrest mostly  ended up in labour camps, exploited and swopped amongst specialist factories staffed by Der Kamp Kommander or whatever they were called. The radio messages intercepted by British listening posts during WW2 contains much traffic that was just regular camp situation reports, as the Army –and every other large organisation- demands on regular basis. This included transportation numbers, ill and dead numbers, camp swop movements, all carefully kept record by both the Nazis and Her Majesty, and it has been released as is the norm for old documents, and now we can all have better insight into daily camp life; repetitive, boring, hard work, really boring rations, but enough to make sure you stay healthy enough to work, and we know how mythically industrious the Germans are… Not a good life for most, but you are looked after at least as well as a sheep or cow. A man may slaughter a cow for processing, but random wanton slaughter of even rabbits is seen as counterproductive and even cruel.

The only sane conclusion to be drawn, is that both BLM and JDL are propagandising against white people by instilling in them racial guilt for mythical wrongs. After all the depredation and abuse at the hands of one religio-political mafia after another, the white man will, once again, see his family members burn at the stake of righteous genocide. Arab slave dealers, Roman genocide, Moore slavery, Roman Catholic genocide, Dark ages, Roman Catholic omniregicide, witch hunts, Protestant destruction of the remains of white culture, witch hunts, revolutions, world wars, the druggification of the nation, now AntiFa and the War on Terror, and all this is costing, and it is time the white man pays. The white supremacist neo-nazi fascist scum must pay the world’s debts, and the only help they can expect, is from them darn muslim fundamentalist jihadi ragheads. That is to say; if they can resist getting into the schoolyard scrap the United States of Israel are trying so desperately to instigate between Muslims and the so-called West. “The West” is just another word for White People, whatever your definition of ‘white’ is, and they have been foot soldiers to Capital for many centuries now, but how do the ‘developing nations’ take revenge on an economic theory? They want their revenge, though…

How to Spot Fake News

There is currently a War on Fake News raging on a television near you. Also in newspapers, internet blogs, Twitting accounts and every other so-called social media. When last did you come across an unsocial medium, eh? Anyway, if you have been foolish enough to have read some of the other drivel on this site, you would know that we consider all these wonderful wars as a Mafia tool used to ring-fence specific industries into state-protected monopolies. In this context, the War on Fake News is the bit where the Mafia goes around offering Real Truth at a price we cannot afford, and shooting down anybody that refuses to pay the protection fee; In other words, somebody is busy building a huge, state-protected and murderously monopolistic Organised Fake News organisation.

Much of the groundwork to ‘protect the news’ was laid in the days of Rockefeller and Vanderbilt and Rothschild, but has recently been almost totally consolidated under Rupert Murdoch and Ted Turner, between them they own or at least control nearly every newspaper, television station and textbook printer in the world. With the advent of the Internet, though, publishing became so cheap, anybody could send his thoughts out into the world, free to compete with every other meme it comes across, or never-die miserable and alone on an unvisited, unlinked-to and never-tagged blog somewhere… but it will never-die free and Out There! Out There where anybody can stumble across it, and be radicalised, radicalised to question the Official Narrative. Important journalists these days often comment on the importance of “owning the narrative”, as in “We are doing everything possible to prevent radicalised propaganda outlets from owning the narrative”. Luckily, these ‘journalists’ are so important, they think we do not understand the big things they say, so they sometimes forget to hide their loyalties and ambitions to participate in the Big Cleansing of the earth, when all the poor people they gonna die, and here are some of the things they say, and how to recognise Fake News.

The first thing to ask about your news source is how they tell the story of 911. Any newsperson that still talks about terrorists flying aeroplanes into buildings is lying. May be that the person in question is just not properly informed, which would mean your source is just too ignorant to be informative. The only other reason any journalist would support the terrorist-myth, is because that journalist is actively partaking in the telling of the Lie. It is forgivable for a journalist not to know much engineering, or chemistry, or politics, or finance, but the slightest bit of enquiry can tell something is wrong with the official narrative, and as such, supporting that narrative cannot be good for freedom or liberty or whatever it is that journalist pretends to sell us every day. Millions of people have been killed because the Americans ‘took revenge’ for 911, millions. At least a million Iraqi children died of hunger and thirst, because the Americans exploded all the water-works, roads, schools hospitals…good gad man, they mowed down old women and babies with machine guns loaded with radioactive scrap metal, all in the name of fighting terrorism in the aftermath of the professional, nay, expert demolition of the dangerously unstable West Tower of the World Trade Centre. Demolishing the second tower was probably necessitated by the massive impact of the first tower hitting the hollowed-out ground right next door. Tower 7, the most obvious clue to the fraud, was not only stupidly timed, it was pure opportunist bull. No-one ever managed to produce one single piece of aircraft at any of the so-called impact sites. Air conditioning ducts and lift-hoist motors have been presented as aeroplane parts, we will not even discuss that here. All official news in this regards is false, as is just about every ‘critical analysis’. Israeli missiles from German submarines, Cruise missile dropped from a bomber plane, nuclear charges laid by demolishers, God’s vengeance upon gays, the involvement of Osama bin Ladin, the Saudi connection, all of it is discussed at length somewhere by somebody on every medium, constantly, while the few sane voices are drowned by Fake News on Fake Issues. Any nonsense possible about 911 is published freely, promoted as divine revelation until the next theory, it matters not which, as long as we keep alive the myth that terrorists flew aeroplanes into buildings, because that is terribly terrorists, and now we have laws that make a joke of any law you have ever known, all human rights are rubbish, all activity is monitored, everybody is a suspect, because on 911 terrorists flew aeroplanes into buildings...oy vey!

Another thing to check your news channel for is their willingness to call people terrorists. There was a time the news reported on alleged perpetrators and alleged incidents and alleged crimes. Once it became fashionable to call discontent people terrorists, allegations are now pointedly thrown at whoever is to be blamed, until said allegation sticks. Trial by publicity has become the norm, instead of a crime. It matters not if they report on Friend or Foe, common decency calls for restraint, not mob lynching. It might look funny when they rip into someone you consider to be an enemy, but many times, the only reason you know the enemy to be an enemy is because the people calling him an enemy told you about his enigmatic intentions. That is dangerous circular logic, and any reader of these pages would agree that to be counter-evolutionary, and you probably know that enigmatic has nothing to do with terrorist threats, just an example how word associations can cause just enough cerebral confusion to make fake logic stick.

This is something important about Fake News to remember; the people formulating the Fake News are highly trained behaviourists and top notch actors, in other words, people who understand how we think, and how we act upon those thoughts. Nobody tells you to go out into the streets to burn tyres and stone cars, we are merely reminded how angry it makes us that some people can afford to drive alone in a car while my children are cold and hungry. Politicians are just people appointed to speak at us about the things that have already been accomplished while we were watching the show, to put into words our feelings in a manner that defuses the current discontent while breeding plenty more discontent for next time they need something to keep the ‘news’ cameras busy. The course for human extinction has been set, and the art of government currently consists solely of managing the population’s emotional outbursts. This necessitates Enemies for our Friends to defeat in Our Name, and when you need enemies, it is always best not to go too far; more than 60% of all murders happen amongst family and friends. It is also worth reading the definition of ‘terrorism’, please consult a proper dictionary or type ‘lexicon’ into the search button top right of the page. Back? Good, then you agree, terrorism absolutely demands that you find your enemies right inside your own house…it builds national unity! Now consider the importance of journalists pointing at someone and shouting “terrorist” until everybody knows exactly who the ‘terror suspect’ for the next ‘incident’ will be. It is vitally important to the terrorists that we stay afraid, and any journalist that takes joy out of scaring you, is not on your side. Any journalists that assures you all is well, is not on your side. Any journalist that can offer you a balanced diet of despair and hope, is an excellent journalist that understands his job, a Master, and he is definitely not on your side. That head on your TV that is an expert has-been secret services honcho? That’s not even a journalist, just a talking head habituated to speaking a minions about things they can only dimply comprehend, and he is there to tell you the Whole Truth, and that truth is Overpopulation, and Climate Change, and Terrorism, and High Finance, and he is not on your side. No-one is, you have to find the next fact, always the next fact. You are the army of One, you are out there, behind enemy lines, alone, afraid, and the entire Gestapo is after your useless, radicalised ass, and your only ammunition is facts, and the only weapon you have left, is your own mind, and a soldier never lays down arms while there is a civilian left to protect. Never hand in your weapon, never disarm in the face of enemy rhetoric, wear the badge of discontent, radicalised fascist with pride, and never join any of those militias out there, they are at best revolutionaries, mostly just limited hangouts.

Dark Energy, Dark Matter, Dork Science

Bang! It is just a theory, you know. It’s not the only theory, it is in many ways not the best theory, but it sure explains a few things we otherwise would have no explanation for. Unfortunately, explaining a thing does not make it so. Remember that science is as much religion as religion is science, and the big bang theorists are a rather religious lot. But we are not here to discuss the merits of that theory, no, rather we are here gathered to lay to rest at least one fable used as foundation to the theory of big bangs: The need for Dark Things to explain the accelerating expansion of our universe. I am not sure if I want to get into the whole shebang here, you probably just want a snippet, so here goes:

We know the universe is expanding because the colours of distant stars show too much red, explained by the same effect that causes a car passing you at speed to sound “wheeeeeeee-eeerrr—ooooo”, or a train whistle coming past as “twee-youuu”. A star coming past would look “blueeee-white-reeeddd”. The wise ones then further pronounce that the further the star is away from us, the redder it looks, therefore the faster it is moving. The original theories made an observation  that we know the big bang threw the stars away from the centre, but sooner or later they must slow down, and all fall back into the big bang where they came from. Clever maths was employed to show that the gods added a Cosmic Constant to keep us all floating still. Then they found the redshift thing, which means we are expanding. Then newer instruments showed that, the further the stars are, the redder they are, the faster they must be moving, so they are accelerating! The ‘only’ explanation was that there is waaay more mass and energy available in our universe than we see; from there, Dark Matter/Energy. This model puts us, on earth, solidly in the centre of an expanding universe. The big bang happened on the corner of Fourth and Mavis streets, you can still see the splatmarks…. even better proof humanity is still firmly rooted at the centre of the universe...

Today is 8 March 2018, any of you cosmologist nerds want to take this further, please note that copyright is mine, I will smear you if you plagiarise me without permission and credit. Cash, no credit, cash. And credit. Here are some unconsidered simple truths for cosmologists, from an African subsistence farmer:

The redshift is a dead giveaway. In an expanding, accelerating, isotropic universe, where everything looks exactly the same in all directions, the redshift cannot be isotropic. Further, redshift has other causes than relative velocities. Also, in a universe created into an absolute vacuum, the debris (stars) would be falling into the vacuum. Falling, get it? Falling things accelerate, who knows where to in this case. That would be an explanation, should you convince me the acceleration exists. There is, however, an easy rebuttal to the current theory, demonstrated by a thought experiment: Image standing halfway between the original Bang, and the outer limit of our universe. Now, look at star colours, the slowest ones towards the Bang will be redshifted, because we are going faster than them, obviously, we have moved further in the same timeframe. Looking towards the outer limit, we again see redshift, as those are the stars flying faster than us. The further they are, the faster they are moving, the redder they are, no acceleration needed. So far so good, but what of the stars that move more or less at our speed? They should be pure white, because we are moving together. There has to be an entire spherical field around the Bang centre, moving at the same speed as us, and you should be able to recognise them from very far away, even though they are further from us than the redshifted stars we left behind us, nearer the Bang epicentre. Whether we are accelerating or not, that hollow ball of stars will accompany us always, or at least till the end of the universe.

“So why the observed acceleration?” Easy, the whole concept of redshift/blueshift is dependent upon understanding the Newtonian model of light, where the three primary colours are red, green blue, which together make up white. This is a valid theory, and we have found much use from it, like building colour televisions. There is another, more interesting colour theory produced by a man who hated Newton’s obnoxious face (his words), Johann Goethe. Herr Goethe shows us what happens to light in many more combinations and circumstances, it is really something worth reading. The cosmologists should also familiarise themselves with Goethe’s work, then they would realise that the increased redshift of faraway stars is due to a simple effect of a not-quite-pure medium that allows white light to freely pass. Such light is always reddened, whereas a medium that diffracts (refracts?) white light tends to turn it blue, like in glacier ice. Goethe uses a black transluscent marble to demonstrate. Outer space is not empty, you see, of course light from far away gets scattered by cosmic particles, just like in a milky white glass marble, as Goethe showed. No acceleration needed, the medium causes the redshift.

So, will the Dark Mutterers please save their Dork Energy for real science, instead of wasting research grants on fanciful misinterpretations of data heavily biased by the instrumentation available, and the (good but biased) intellects using those instruments. Now use those telescopes properly: How far is Planet X?

The 3 Laws of Robotics in Modern Terms


  1. A robot may not, by action or inaction, cause harm to a human.
  2. A robot shall obey orders from a human, except where in conflict with Rule 1.
  3. A robot shall protect itself from harm, provided it does not conflict with Rule 1 or 2.


Robots are rapidly evolving, some into vicious killing machines, some are little more than electric bookshelves. Some fly all the way to Afghanistan to bomb little kiddies in their hospital beds. Some robots will fetch any movie or music you command it to, and play it back exactly the way it was played back the first time, over and over…if you are one of the nondividuals who like modern pop music you even have robot orchestras playing your favourite, repetitive, gormless series of structured noises.  Pop music, written on and by computers, are the final proof that robots have no soul. Those music robots are not subject to the Three Laws, and continue to harm our sense of artistic appreciation.

Read more ...